Її
"an
Anim
Ordinance, bok
Can will of amor be bakery be
conquest you
I have
to cause the draft to
O in
be first comparing with
Ordinances no.
3
J 807 1882 F
1881, no. 80f no. 9 of 1884, din order
that there may be no inconsistency between those measures
Law.Ardinance.
the new m
3. Jobserve that the
draft follows the
To charly that Straits Ordinance, by
copying
the misprint
"so be " at the end of clause 1; by using several clause the
Appears in both, that
term "Peace off Officer "
is
which, eo for as the Lee Jam
so
aware, is not
Hangkung
found in their
and
499
Ordinances;
by introducing the term
"rijovou
ov
is intinducer
Comment
准
sunfle impri- which
"clause 9,
is suitable to the thraits
Harshing. Settlements, but not to thanking 4. I also request you
to refer the attomey ferend
& Thanks Ordinance no. 6 of 1885
(Copy of which is enclosed) passed because
which was
the fort of that Colony found the forum Ret other to keep the
had filt
X necessary
reluvc
(olary always under Procla mation, in order to keep alive the power of Deportation, which might be required
emergency, for which the
othe
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.